Belgium’s royal family is no stranger to public scrutiny, especially when it comes to how they use state funds. Recently, Prince Laurent, the younger brother of King Philippe, found himself at the center of a legal battle over his attempt to claim social security benefits on top of his substantial royal allowance.
Last year alone, Prince Laurent received a hefty sum of €388,000 from state coffers. While this amount may seem extravagant to many, the prince argued that his work within the royal family and his decade-long dedication to an animal welfare charity should entitle him and his family to additional social security benefits.
In a bid that he claimed was driven by principle rather than financial gain, Prince Laurent presented his case before a court in Brussels. He contended that despite being part of the royal household, he also engaged in self-employment through various official duties and charitable endeavors. However, the court was quick to dismiss his argument.
According to reports from Belgian broadcaster RTBF, during the proceedings, Prince Laurent emphasized his lineage’s role in establishing Belgium as a nation-state. He likened himself to a
“migrant”
whose ancestors played a pivotal role in shaping the country’s foundations.
Despite his impassioned plea for recognition under Belgium’s social security system, the court ruled against Prince Laurent’s request. The judge maintained that neither could he be considered self-employed nor an employee based on existing legal frameworks.
However, amid this legal setback for the prince, there was a glimmer of acknowledgment from the judiciary. It was noted that there existed ambiguity in legislation regarding Prince Laurent’s entitlements such as pension benefits. Suggestions were made for legislative amendments to address these gaps more comprehensively.
In response to this ruling and ongoing debate surrounding his financial status and obligations within Belgian society, Olivier Rijckaert – Laurent’s lawyer – reiterated that their pursuit was not merely borne out of caprice but held symbolic significance. Rijckaert underscored that social security is enshrined by Belgian law as a universal right accessible across all strata of society.
The intricacies of Prince Laurent’s financial affairs were also brought into focus during these deliberations. While it may appear that he receives a substantial monthly stipend after accounting for expenses related to running an office and traveling with an assistant paid from his allowance – approximately €5000 remains at his disposal each month – key benefits like medical expense reimbursements continue to elude him due to not having social security coverage.
Beyond these immediate concerns about benefits eligibility lies another pressing issue for Prince Laurent: ensuring financial security for his family posthumously. With apprehensions about potential reductions in royal allowances for his wife Princess Claire Coombs and their three adult children upon his demise looming large – uncertainties persist around securing their future wellbeing.
Prince Laurent’s litigious journey against bureaucratic determinations isn’t unfamiliar territory for him. Previously labeled as Belgium’s
“cursed prince,”
owing partly due to controversial incidents like attending events without clearance or facing speeding violations – navigating public expectations while balancing personal convictions has been somewhat customary throughout his tenure within the monarchy.
As discussions continue within legal circles regarding potential appeals or legislative reforms prompted by this case – one thing remains certain; Belgium’s princely saga underscores wider societal debates about entitlements versus responsibilities in contemporary governance structures.
Leave feedback about this